Schools and Religion
“Kansas board looks at class on religion” (Kansas City Star) Reg. Req.
The state already has science standards, and the board is expected to begin a review of them soon. But it has no such standards for teaching religion, a subject most public schools in the nation shy away from.
Public schools have been uncomfortable about teaching religion, Wagnon said, because of the restrictions imposed by the First Amendment. But schools might be interested in offering a class on the history of religion, for example, if the state provided them with guidelines on how to go about doing so, he said.
I think this is actually a good idea. It would do children a lot of good to understand belief systems other than the secular humanism that so many of them seem to pick up in schools today, if for no other reason than to help make those of other faiths seem less alien.
Teachers would have to be very careful, though, to teach Christianity without letting the anti-Christian bias that seems to seep into so much in today’s society affect the way that the history and culture of Christianity is presented. Teaching more people to believe the lie that Christians are evil warmongerers equivalent to those who flew planes into the Twin Towers and the pentagon would be a travesty. Especially if it’s taught in an official capacity.
A trial under way in U.S. District Court in Atlanta is weighing a lawsuit that challenges a decision in Cobb County, Ga., to place stickers that say evolution is “a theory, not a fact†in science books.
School officials decided to include the stickers two years ago after parents complained the books presented evolution as a fact without mentioning rival ideas about the origin of life, namely creationism.
A group of parents and the American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit challenging the stickers as a violation of the First Amendment. The trial, to be decided by a judge, is expected to last several days.
Evolution, on the micro scale, is a fact. Evolution as an origin of species, however, is a theory that has no more evidence than Creationism as an origin of species. I understand why a teacher explaining creationism could be construed as a violation of the Establishment Clause (though I disagree — especially if it’s just listed as an alternate belief). I don’t understand why teaching the theory of evolution should be taught as fact when it’s a theory!