<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalism: There and Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onestackmind.com/2006/04/28/journalism-there-and-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/04/28/journalism-there-and-here/</link>
	<description>My LIFO and Times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/04/28/journalism-there-and-here/#comment-4419</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=663#comment-4419</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fine point you make about the Insurgent-- such is the nature of their confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fine point you make about the Insurgent&#8211; such is the nature of their confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin S.</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/04/28/journalism-there-and-here/#comment-4408</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=663#comment-4408</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note, Bryan.  I&#039;ve attempted to clarify the post.  If you feel it&#039;s still confusing, let me know, and I&#039;ll clarify further.

I am curious, though, about the Insurgent&#039;s publishing both Marxist &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; anarchist screeds; I would&#039;ve thought that the two philosophies were almost diametrically opposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, Bryan.  I&#8217;ve attempted to clarify the post.  If you feel it&#8217;s still confusing, let me know, and I&#8217;ll clarify further.</p>
<p>I am curious, though, about the Insurgent&#8217;s publishing both Marxist <em>and</em> anarchist screeds; I would&#8217;ve thought that the two philosophies were almost diametrically opposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/04/28/journalism-there-and-here/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=663#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the link, Robin.
Just a point of clarification for you and your readers: it&#039;s apparent that you realize the Oregon Commentator is a different paper than the Insurgent, but it&#039;s misleading that you merge the two names with the term &quot;Oregon Insurgent&quot;. While both are student-run publications on the University of Oregon campus, one is known for Marxist/anarchist screeds and the other is known for qualified arguments in favor of free speech, free markets and other affirmations of the American lifestyle.
The paper that printed the Jesus cartoons is known simply as The Insurgent, or sometimes more elaborately as The Student Insurgent when they want to differentiate themselves from terrorists, which they generally don&#039;t. 
An altogether different paper-- The Oregon Commentator, for which I work-- scanned the Insurgent&#039;s recent issue to the web, where we host it on a link from our site. Their images had triggered a controversy on campus and elsewhere, but the Insurgent is too lazy to update their own website. We do not endorse their content, but we do endorse their and everyone else&#039;s right to print whatever they want to-- for many reasons, not the least of which is that the best way to defeat a bad argument is to get it out into the open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the link, Robin.<br />
Just a point of clarification for you and your readers: it&#8217;s apparent that you realize the Oregon Commentator is a different paper than the Insurgent, but it&#8217;s misleading that you merge the two names with the term &#8220;Oregon Insurgent&#8221;. While both are student-run publications on the University of Oregon campus, one is known for Marxist/anarchist screeds and the other is known for qualified arguments in favor of free speech, free markets and other affirmations of the American lifestyle.<br />
The paper that printed the Jesus cartoons is known simply as The Insurgent, or sometimes more elaborately as The Student Insurgent when they want to differentiate themselves from terrorists, which they generally don&#8217;t.<br />
An altogether different paper&#8211; The Oregon Commentator, for which I work&#8211; scanned the Insurgent&#8217;s recent issue to the web, where we host it on a link from our site. Their images had triggered a controversy on campus and elsewhere, but the Insurgent is too lazy to update their own website. We do not endorse their content, but we do endorse their and everyone else&#8217;s right to print whatever they want to&#8211; for many reasons, not the least of which is that the best way to defeat a bad argument is to get it out into the open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
