<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq War: Longer than World War II?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/</link>
	<description>My LIFO and Times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin S.</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6330</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6330</guid>
		<description>Which, of course, was more or less my point with this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which, of course, was more or less my point with this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinzou</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6320</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinzou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6320</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that it is silly or disrespectful to measure how long a war lasts.  That is just history.  The silly and disrepectful part is determining the merit of a war by comparing its length to that of another war.   There is so much more involved that just an elapsed time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that it is silly or disrespectful to measure how long a war lasts.  That is just history.  The silly and disrepectful part is determining the merit of a war by comparing its length to that of another war.   There is so much more involved that just an elapsed time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnyankaBunnyfear</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6310</link>
		<dc:creator>AnyankaBunnyfear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6310</guid>
		<description>measuring wars is silly and disrespectful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>measuring wars is silly and disrespectful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin S.</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>The problem is that you could create criteria that would make America&#039;s involvement in WWII go from Dec. 7, 1941 through VJ day (instead of through the end of our occupation) without limiting the &quot;Iraq War&quot; to the day of the &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot; thing.

In Japan, when the government surrendered, the fighting was essentially over. There were no foreign powers with any great interest in fighting us in Japan (the way that various terrorist organizations are in Iraq), and the Japanese weren&#039;t really prone to fighting us for various reasons.  Their culture would&#039;ve seen it as a great disgrace to go against the emperor and not accept the surrender, plus we&#039;d pretty much destroyed their will to fight, I think, after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  

In Iraq, the government didn&#039;t so much &quot;surrender&quot; as &quot;get completely obliterated&quot;, there &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; foreign powers fighting us on Iraqi soil, and we have been &lt;em&gt;extremely&lt;/em&gt; careful about avoiding civilian deaths.  (Which may not be an entirely good thing, since what we&#039;re effectively doing is making war less horrible, which makes it more likely that our enemies would want to risk war -- I&#039;m reminded of the Star Trek episode, &quot;A Taste of Armageddon&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that you could create criteria that would make America&#8217;s involvement in WWII go from Dec. 7, 1941 through VJ day (instead of through the end of our occupation) without limiting the &#8220;Iraq War&#8221; to the day of the &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; thing.</p>
<p>In Japan, when the government surrendered, the fighting was essentially over. There were no foreign powers with any great interest in fighting us in Japan (the way that various terrorist organizations are in Iraq), and the Japanese weren&#8217;t really prone to fighting us for various reasons.  Their culture would&#8217;ve seen it as a great disgrace to go against the emperor and not accept the surrender, plus we&#8217;d pretty much destroyed their will to fight, I think, after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  </p>
<p>In Iraq, the government didn&#8217;t so much &#8220;surrender&#8221; as &#8220;get completely obliterated&#8221;, there <em>are</em> foreign powers fighting us on Iraqi soil, and we have been <em>extremely</em> careful about avoiding civilian deaths.  (Which may not be an entirely good thing, since what we&#8217;re effectively doing is making war less horrible, which makes it more likely that our enemies would want to risk war &#8212; I&#8217;m reminded of the Star Trek episode, &#8220;A Taste of Armageddon&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinzou</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinzou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>I think your footnote is the biggest point that needs to be addressed by the writer.  You have to measure both wars using the same criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your footnote is the biggest point that needs to be addressed by the writer.  You have to measure both wars using the same criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Stack Mind &#187; Diving into the Cesspool</title>
		<link>http://onestackmind.com/2006/08/21/iraq-war-longer-than-world-war-ii/#comment-6289</link>
		<dc:creator>One Stack Mind &#187; Diving into the Cesspool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onestackmind.com/?p=708#comment-6289</guid>
		<description>[...] A bit more from yesterday&#8217;s Gazette (yesterday&#8217;s post), this time from the &#8220;Readers&#8217; Voice&#8221; segment, featuring small quotes from readers who&#8217;ve called in to offer their opinions on various tidbits. Based on the topics covered in the Voice, I&#8217;m guessing that something over the weekend put people&#8217;s minds on smoking, because that&#8217;s what seemed to come up a lot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A bit more from yesterday&#8217;s Gazette (yesterday&#8217;s post), this time from the &#8220;Readers&#8217; Voice&#8221; segment, featuring small quotes from readers who&#8217;ve called in to offer their opinions on various tidbits. Based on the topics covered in the Voice, I&#8217;m guessing that something over the weekend put people&#8217;s minds on smoking, because that&#8217;s what seemed to come up a lot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

