Worse than the Worst Case Scenario?
Megan McArdle writes, in her post “Of online debate and hidden agendas,” that she’s probably going to vote for Obama, but she’s not happy about it:
Both Obama and McCain supporters seem convinced that my every utterance on the topic is part of my not-so-hidden agenda to undermine their candidate. I have no hidden agenda. My agenda is out-front and open; I’ll probably vote for Obama, but not with any expectation that I’ll like the result very much. I am not excited about this election. I do not believe that my vote is going to immanentize the eschaton. I do not think that I am engaged in a titanic battle, in which the forces of good must beat back the cosmic evil that threatens to engulf us all. I think I’m deciding which of two politicians to hand a lot of power I don’t want either of them to have.
Emphasis mine.
I was, quite honestly, prepared to vote for whomever the Democratic party nominated this year, assuming it wasn’t Hillary Clinton. Not because I expected to like them much, but because I can’t bear the thought of “President McCain.” As I’ve mentioned before, I thought a Clinton/McCain race would be a Worst Case Scenario.
The more I learn about Barack Obama, though, I’m not sure that Clinton would’ve been a worse choice. I’m getting less and less excited about this election as it approaches, because both candidates are atrocious. I don’t want either of them to win, but, come election day, I may have to break my own promise, hold my nose, and vote for McCain. He is, after all, the least repulsive Democrat running.